<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;" _mce_style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;"><strong>This week's&nbsp;<em>shtikle</em>&nbsp;is dedicated&nbsp;<em>le'iluy nishmas</em>&nbsp;my&nbsp;<em>rebbe</em>&nbsp;and Rosh HaYeshivah of Yeshivas Ner Yisroel, Harav Yaakov Moshe Kulefsky,&nbsp;<em>zt"l</em>&nbsp;(Yaakov Moshe ben Refael Nissan Shlomo)&nbsp;whose&nbsp;22^nd <em>yahrtzeit&nbsp;</em>is this coming Sunday, the 3rd of Kisleiv.&nbsp;</strong>&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;" _mce_style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;">When Eisav returns from his hunting escapades, he is so mortally fatigued that he was willing to give up his first-born rights for a simple bowl of lentils. After Yaakov and Eisav finally agree, the&nbsp;<em>pasuk</em>&nbsp;recounts (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Genesis.25.34" _mce_href="https://www.sefaria.org/Genesis.25.34">25:34</a>) that Yaakov gave Eisav bread and lentil soup. Why did Yaakov give him bread? That was never part of the deal.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;" _mce_style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;">R' Ari Storch, in "Tif'eres Aryeh," offers a novel approach. This sale is altogether puzzling as the first born-rights have not yet come into existence, a&nbsp;<em>davar shelo ba la'olam</em>. According to Talmudic tradition, the sale of such an entity is not valid and it is as if it were never sold. How then did this sale even work?</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;" _mce_style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;">The Tur deals with this issue and discusses many possible answers. He suggests one answer from his father, the Rosh. When a sale is accompanied by the taking of an oath, the oath validates that sale even if it is of a seemingly illegitimate nature such as this one. We see clearly that Yaakov added an oath to the sale which would have otherwise been considered unnecessary.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;" _mce_style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;">From the&nbsp;<em>gemara&nbsp;</em>(<a href="http://beta.hebrewbooks.org/shas.aspx?mesechta=16&amp;daf=28&amp;format=pdf" _mce_href="http://beta.hebrewbooks.org/shas.aspx?mesechta=16&amp;daf=28&amp;format=pdf">Nedarim 28a</a>, which was recently covered by<em> daf yomi</em>) it appears that an oath which is taken by duress may be invalidated by contrary thoughts at the time of the oath. That is, if the oath taker was thinking at the time that he was only taking the oath to escape the situation of duress, that oath may be null and void. Eisav came back from his outing thinking he was about to die. He could certainly have claimed that the oath he made with Yaakov was simply made for his own survival, but he did not mean it. Yaakov therefore first fed him bread after which his life was no longer in jeopardy. Eisav then had no claim to invalidate the oath he took to affirm the sale of the first-born rights for the lentil soup.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;" _mce_style="font-size: large; font-family: times new roman, times;">Have a good Shabbos and Chodesh Tov.&nbsp;</span></p>